James Rink incredible Story
Time Travel Technology
Types of Super Soldiers
Extraterestrials
Galactic Federation
ACIO database
Peter the Insider
King Solomon's Gold
James Rink incredible Story
Time Travel Technology
Types of Super Soldiers
Extraterestrials
Galactic Federation
ACIO database
Peter the Insider
King Solomon's Gold
Donnersberg is Thir's Mountain, the highest mountain (2,320 ft., 687 meters) of the Haardt Mountains of the Palatinate, was once the seat of the worship of Thor (Thunder), hence the name. Until the early years of the 20th century there was on it a "Mennonite farm" (Mennonitenhof).
The first Mennonite family to live here was the Eymann family. In 1755 Michael Krehbiel, a great-grandson of the Peter Krehbiel, the first Mennonite to settle on the Weierhof (1682) after expulsion from the canton of Bern in Switzerland, leased it as a hereditary possession from the reigning prince. It contained nearly 200 acres of arable land and meadow. The farm remained in the hands of the Krehbiel family for 100 years, the grandson of the original purchaser dividing it with his brother-in-law Jakob Danner.
During the Palatine Revolt of 1849 against the rejection of the constitution adopted by the Frankfurt Parliament, the peace of the Mennonite farm was also broken.
Since the lease of the farm carried with it also certain rights to the use of other pasture and forest lands, the government tried by various means to reclaim possession of the farm for the hunting and wood rights attached to it, during the middle of the 19th century. Finally, after lengthy litigation the Krehbiel and Danner families were compelled to sell it to the state in 1854 for the sum of 24,000 florins, and settle on land nearby. -- Neff.
Mont Tonnerre was also the name given by the French, who occupied the Palatinate from the time of the French Revolution until 1814, to a government district with its center at Mainz, extending far beyond the present district called Palatinate. In 1811 Ferdinand Bodmann, the divisional superintendent of the prefecture at Mainz, in an annual report to be found in the archives at Speyer, characterized the Palatine Mennonites as "being occupied solely with that which concerns their faith and their personal affairs, indifferent to political events, the consequences of which do not extend to them, reminiscent of the patriarchal life of olden times." The description of eight pages, characterizing the Mennonites of the Donnersberg Department, i.e., of the entire region of the Palatinate, is of interest as being the first official document that openly presents the religious and moral customs of the Mennonites as non-injurious to church and state. Hitherto such judgments had been expressed at most only in the secret official records, and then acted upon with the old prejudice. "Simple clothing and simpler manners" were to this writer the marks that distinguished the Mennonites from Catholics and Protestants. His interest in their civil rights is evident in the opening description of the Mennonites: "Industriously and soberly they carry on their agriculture and cattle raising with fortunate results. Agriculture in our department owes much to this sect." Bodmann estimated their number as 2,200 individuals, having increased by 850 in nine years. "The craze for emigration, which has not left the Mennonites untouched," is given as a reason why they were not still more numerous. In the department they were living chiefly in Speyer, in the cantons of Bechtheim, Kirchheimbolanden, Mainz, and a few in the Zweibrücken district.
Born in Gârcina, near Piatra Neamț in Moldavia, he was descended from a line of priests. He studied at Socola Monastery's seminary in Iași,[1] attending between 1834 and 1841 and in 1842–1843.[2] He subsequently became a monk at age twenty, taking on the name of Melchisedec.[1] His first post was as a teacher in Șerbești village from 1841 to 1842; this was followed by a stint as substitute professor at Socola from 1843 to 1848.[2] He was sent to study at the Kiev Theological Academy in 1848, graduating in 1851 with a master's degree in theology and literature.[1] Ordained a deacon at Socola in 1844, he was made a priest at the Kiev Pechersk Lavra in 1851.[2] He undertook study visits to Odessa and Saint Petersburg, undertaking library research and perfecting his Russian-language skills.[1]
In 1852, after returning home, Melchisedec was made deputy archimandrite, rising to archimandrite in 1856 and being consecrated bishop in 1862.[3] He taught at Socola from 1851 to 1856, and from that point until 1861, was teacher and director at the seminary in Huși. As a seminary teacher, he published numerous textbooks, mainly translated from Russian. His first period in charge of a diocese lasted from 1861 to 1864, when he was acting Bishop of Huși.[2]
As early as 1856, Melchisedec began campaigning for the union between Moldavia and Wallachia, publishing a pamphlet that aimed to convince Romanian society of the wisdom of such a step. His fellow bishop Neofit Scriban wrote a similar piece, bringing the two into conflict with Ecumenical Patriarch Cyril VII.[4] The following year, already famous throughout Moldavia, he was elected as one of four clergy representatives to the ad-hoc divan, actively participating in the union process.[4][5] The deputies drafted a program for church reform, calling for autocephaly, a solution to the problem of foreign-owned monasteries and an end to the election of foreign bishops. Taken together, the document stressed the need to end dependence on Constantinople and establish an autonomous national church fit for a nation in the process of creating its political self-governance.[4]
In 1859, as the "United Principalities" came into existence, Melchisedec joined the committee for nationalizing the monasteries' holdings. Together with Mihail Kogălniceanu, he drafted the law on secularization of monastic estates, as the only bishop in the Principalities to support Domnitor Alexandru Ioan Cuza in this endeavor.[5] The following spring, he became Minister of Religious Affairs and Public Instruction in the Moldavian government.[5] The presence of a bishop in the cabinet drew objections from Parliament,[6] with the great boyars unwilling to accept the presence of a mere archimandrite in such a high position.[7] Kogălniceanu responded by defending his right to serve as minister and carry out his mission of reorganizing the church and help the clergy. Nevertheless, Melchisedec resigned after a few days, wishing to avoid trouble for a cabinet that had won approval with much difficulty.[6] However, he continued to back Cuza's modernization program as a historical necessity.[7]
In 1864, following the consolidation of a single Orthodox church for the Principalities, he was placed in the new position of Bishop of the Lower Danube, in an acting capacity; the following year, through a decree signed by Domnitor Cuza, he took on the position on a permanent basis.[2] His see was located at Ismail, where for the next fourteen years he organized the diocese and paid close attention to improving the seminary.[8] In February 1868, Melchisedec and Ioan C. Cantacuzino were sent by Domnitor Carol I on a special mission to Saint Petersburg, to discuss the upgrading of Romania–Russia relations.[9][10] They handed Tsar Alexander II a letter from Carol and asked to negotiate unresolved political matters—such as reducing the special protections of Russian subjects on Romanian soil.[9] In a letter sent to the Domnitor earlier the same year, Otto von Bismarck, who had previously served as ambassador to Russia, expressed his confidence in the bishop's success. Indeed, he was well received by Russian officials, including the tsar, who kissed his hand out of respect.[10] While there, Melchisedec also tried to persuade Alexander Gorchakov to mediate between his church and the Ecumenical Patriarchate, in order to resolve disputed over the appointment of Romanian bishops.[9]
In 1878, after Ismail and the Budjak were ceded to the Russian Empire via the Treaty of Berlin, Melchisedec and his bishopric were moved to Galați.[8] The following February, he was elected Bishop of Roman, remaining there until his death.[2][3] At Roman, he transformed the diocesan garden into a genuine park, with flowers and fruit trees, fountains and shelters; and financed most renovations himself. He also persuaded the state to build a new, spacious seminary. In all three dioceses he led, Melchisedec imposed discipline on the clergy and hired assistants based on merit. He managed to persuade wealthy ktitors to finance village churches or help in other ways. Although busy with research, he found time for pastoral visits, dispensing valuable advice. He encouraged young people to study, giving them books and money; sent the most promising to Czernowitz or Kiev, and persuaded the Holy Synod to grant scholarships.[11]
As a member of the Holy Synod, Melchisedec worked hard to draft numerous important proposals for laws and regulations, and was essentially its key member. Indeed, the entire modern organization of the Romanian church and its religious institutes is almost entirely the work of Melchisedec.[5] A particular preoccupation, and the subject of several reports, was the obtaining of autocephaly. He belonged ex officio to the Romanian Senate. The Synod sent him to Bonn in 1875 in order to attend the Old Catholic Church conference, an early ecumenist gesture.[2] During the Romanian War of Independence, which also involved Russia, Melchisedec donated an important sum of money to the government for equipping the army.[1]
Melchisedec's prestige waned following the establishment of a Romanian Kingdom in 1881. Subjected to years of attacks by the press, he was excoriated for having supported Cuza's reforms and accused of having ties to Russia and the Russian Orthodox Church. The source of these intrigues appears to have been Roman Catholic circles displeased at his pamphlet directed against their church's alleged proselytism in Romania. Moreover, he had enemies within the Synod, including Partenie Clinceni and Ghenadie Petrescu, envious of his erudition and achievements. An especial political adversary was Dimitrie Sturdza, whom Melchisedec refused to support. In addition, Melchisedec had attracted the suspicions of Carol I, by then King of Romania and a Triple Alliance supporter. He was persuaded that the bishop was a Russophile, and hostile to his plans. Taken together, these factors prevented Melchisedec's election as head of the church, both in 1875 after the death of Nifon Rusailă; and particularly in 1886, following Calinic Miclescu's death.[12] Melchisedec was nevertheless honored by the Russian establishment: in 1887, Russian monarch Alexander III, who referred to Melchisedec as "the most brilliant bishop of the Romanian kingdom", sent the latter greetings and an expensive egolpion (small icon worn by bishops as a necklace), in recognition of 45 years' service to church and country.
Elected a titular member of the Romanian Academy in 1870,[13] he belonged to eight other scientific and cultural societies from Paris, Tarnovo, Kiev, Saint Petersburg, Athens and Constantinople.[5] Among his admirers as a scholar were Bogdan Petriceicu Hasdeu, a contemporary and the younger Nicolae Iorga.[5][14] His most important historical and philological work was Cronica Hușilor.[5] His 1871 book on the Lipovans was the first ample study of this community in Romania and its surroundings;[15] the work covered the Romanian Old Kingdom proper as well as neighboring Bukovina and Dobruja, then under Austrian and Ottoman administration, respectively. He analyzed its hierarchy, the differences in worship from the state church and the group's demographic profile.[15] In all, he published over sixty works of history, theology and teaching during a period that saw a transition from the Romanian Cyrillic alphabet to the modern Latin alphabet. Melchisedec wrote mainly in the latter script, but preferred Cyrillic writing for religious books.
Melchisedec was active within the Academy: he presented reviews of books by Moses Gaster, Gheorghe Asachi and others; displayed original Moldavian decrees written in Old Church Slavonic; and proposed the publication of a collection comprising 64 sermons by John Chrysostom that he had translated from German,[5] in an edition by Karl Josef von Hefele.[2] (The bishop knew seven foreign languages: French, German Russian, Ancient Greek, Latin, Slavonic and Hebrew.) He presented a report about the discovery, inside the Gospel Book of Humor Monastery, of a true portrait depicting Stephen the Great; as well as a series of Slavonic documents and sermons by Anthim the Iberian. Later, the historian Constantin C. Diculescu observed that Melchisedec and Hasdeu were the first Romanian historians who appreciated the true value of early Slavonic records.[5]
He helped found the Romanian Academy Library by donating his personal library of 82 manuscripts and 2,511 books, as well as a collection of 114 coins, to the Academy in his will. It was among the richest libraries in late 19th-century Romania, including books on history, literature, theology, political and social matters, pedagogy, economics, agriculture, science, medicine and art, as well as periodicals. Furthermore, the will left his fortune of 150,000 lei, a hundred beehives and two rows of houses near the cathedral to be administered by the Bishop of Roman. Every year, the income would help finance a recipient's theological studies at Kiev; among those who benefited from the scholarship were Ludovic Cosma, Ioan Țincoca, Vespasian Erbiceanu, Constantin Nazarie and Nicodim Munteanu. He also willed that a kindergarten for local children be established in one of his houses, as well as a school for church singers that would only admit orphans and provide them with free room and board.[12]
The Melchisedec Foundation was established in 1892, the year of his death; its purpose is to carry out the provisions of his will, drafted three years previously. Located in the center of Roman, the entire site is listed as a historic monument by Romania's Ministry of Culture and Religious Affairs, as are several individual buildings: the 1849 house of Doctor Teodoru, which the bishop purchased in 1886; the 1911 church singers' school; the 1915 kindergarten; and the 1938 chapel; his nearby grave is also listed.[16][17] In 1948, the new communist regime nationalized the foundation, which was revived following the Romanian Revolution.
Source Wikipedia
This is an extract of an inteview taken by Kerry Cassidy to Jordan Maxwell before he passed away.
So much of real knowledge and wisdom is hidden
because the people who run this planet feel that true knowledge and
wisdom of how the world really works is knowledge that you don’t
need to know – all you need to do is just go out and do your
job and have fun and watch your basketball and stay out of the way of
the adults that run the world. I never bought that.
I’ve said this, and maybe many
hearing me now have heard me say this, but I’ll say it again –
that the white man’s establishment comes from Europe. And
northern, southern... well, all four: north, east, south and western
Europe, even at the time of the Roman Empire and before, that whole
section of Europe that we call the center for the white man’s
presence on the Earth was quite literally ruled over – ancient
Europe was ruled over – by a priesthood called the Druids.
The Druids were the ministers, the priests, the judges, the
lawyers; they were the religious leaders.
So it was
priesthood that dominated Europe. It still does. Europe is still a
Druidic country, and America is a Druidic country. Unless you
understand the Druidic system, then you’re never going to
figure out what’s going on in America and England.
One
of the most important symbols in the Druid system was a magic wand,
like Merlin the Magician with a magic wand? And also, the orchestra
leaders and conductors always have a magic wand and you had better
play to the tune of the master. He directs you to play and he directs
you to stop with the magic wand, so you’re dancing to his
music. Okay?
Magic wands were always made out of the wood of
a Holly tree. It’s made out of Holly wood. Hollywood is a
Druidic establishment and the symbols, the words, the terms, the
stories, are designed.
Think about it. Think about how
Hollywood does what they do. I’m not saying they’re evil,
I’m just explaining how Hollywood works.
You have,
first of all, a story, so somebody has to write the story. All right?
So now you’ve got a story. Now you have to give it to a
screenwriter, who’s going to adapt that story into a screenplay
because you can’t just tell the story, you have to design it to
be a movie.
Now once you do that, then you’re going to
have to hire the actors – very important: actors --
because you’re going to need people to act the part. It doesn’t
mean that they actually have human feelings. No, no, they’re
being paid to act like they care, to act like they love
someone. It’s an act.
And so you pay actors to act out
the part that the screenwriters have written, and you want to make
sure the actors do it just right, so you have to have a director and
he’s going to direct everything you say and do the way he wants
it said.
Then you have, of course, the producer and he’s
also subjected to the executive producer who’s producing the
money, and so all of this is a whole system of putting together a
system of a story that tells you a story. It causes you to think in
terms of what you just saw, so that people go out from the movie and
think in their minds: This is the way you normally would react to
a situation, the way that the guy in the movie did.
And
so that’s why today in the Western civilization, especially in
the West, our ability to work with each other and live together as
humans is so screwed up, because we‘ve been watching so much
television and so many movies and so much silliness coming out of
Hollywood; so much violence, and sex, and drugs, and all the rest of
it, that people have no idea in the world how to live anymore.
They’ve lost their humanity.
KC: Okay, so you’re
saying that in many ways Hollywood movies and television are actually
sort of doing behavior modification on people...
JM:
Precisely.
KC: ...to get them to behave in certain ways, to
think is socially acceptable and then people actually go out and they
act the way they’re ”supposed” to act, rather than
the way they really feel in any human situation.
JM:
Exactly. Precisely.
KC: So it cements the social structure.
JM: That’s it.
KC: Okay. But
basically we’re talking about the beginning of a reign with
this king, who is a Sun [and/or Son] and he’s basically going
to take control of the world.
JM: Right. Of the whole Earth.
KC: Yeah. And...
JM: And the destiny of the human
family – period.
KC: Okay. And do you know where that
destiny is headed? In other words, what is unique about this Son
[and/or Sun] and his proclivities, his point of view, where he’s
coming from that’s different from what we’ve had before?
JM: I think that the agenda of this one who is to come is to
mutate the human race. I believe that is what is the agenda, is to
mutate the human race – not necessarily evolution, though I
believe that evolution has its place in the world.
I think
that there are things which do evolve. And I’m not talking
about man coming from monkeys because, obviously, man did not come
from monkeys -- man is evolving into monkeys. [Kerry laughs]
And so, that’s the problem. There is a place for evolution, but
that’s not what I’m talking about.
This ancient
story, coming from the ancient and prehistoric world, has dominated
all the cultures of the world. What that implies, I believe,
is there’s going to be some kind of a mutation of the human
race in order to take the human family on the Earth to a new style of
life in the universe.
And so, what will be lost will be your
humanity, your ability to show love and kindness to other
people. There will be no room for that. Emotions – there will
be no room for emotions. There will be no room for the American
system of freedom, liberty, and justice for all. That’s gone.
That’s out. There will be no more freedom, liberty, and justice
for all. No more family love, no more humanity, man reacting to man.
No. All of that’s going to be gone.
KC: Aren’t
you also saying, though, that there is a race of humans being...
actually that this isn’t going to start in the future, that
it’s already started.
JM: Oh yeah. It’s already
started.
Link
https://projectcamelot.org/lang/en/jordan_maxwell_interview_en.html